Designating uninhabitable private land as “critical habitat” discourages private conservation with no compensating benefit for species.
Environmental alarmists may grab headlines, but they’ve repeatedly proven spectacularly wrong. Environmental issues require sober analysis and problem solving, not overheated rhetoric.
Pennsylvania’s trust approach to managing public lands may give environmental groups an incentive to support productive use, to generate revenue for higher value conservation projects.
To protect endangered species, we need to rely more on property rights and less on regulation.
Over on PLF’S Liberty Blog, I have a post on how radical environmentalists answer that question wrong and, as a … More